Publication: ANÁLISIS DE LAS METODOLOGÍAS DE GESTIÓN DE PROYECTOS EN EMPRESAS TECNOLÓGICAS.
Date
2021-01
Authors
MONTERO VALENZUELA, RAFAEL FELIPE
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
La extensa oferta de metodologías de gestión de proyectos y sus distintos enfoques, en conjunto con la percepción, por parte del autor, que las metodologías Ágiles están por sobre las Tradicionales, motivan a llevar a cabo esta tesina.
En esta documentación se realiza un viaje desde el inicio de la gestión de proyectos hasta el año 2020, destacando hitos importantes, metodologías y personajes a lo largo de la historia.
Para esclarecer los indicadores existentes en Chile, se realiza una encuesta a 98 personas que trabajan en la gestión de proyectos acerca de los pros y contras de las metodologías utilizadas por los encuestados, así también se desarrolla una propuesta metodológica para aportar en pos de la mejora en los proyectos.
Los resultados de la encuesta indican que cada metodología influye positivamente en el cumplimiento de plazos, flexibilidad frente al cambio, costos de los proyectos y cultura empresarial, independiente si es Tradicional, Lean o Ágil. De la encuesta se desprende que la fortaleza de Tradicional está relacionada con los costos de los proyectos y su debilidad con la flexibilidad frente al cambio. Ágil en cambio tiene fortaleza en flexibilidad frente al cambio, cumplimiento de plazos y cultura empresarial.
Finalmente se concluye que las metodologías Lean, Tradicionales o Ágiles tienen un perfil de proyecto afín y que dependiendo de los proyectos y equipos de trabajo se puede seleccionar uno u otro enfoque.
The extensive offer of project management methodologies and the different approaches, together with the author's perception that Agile methodologies are above Traditional ones, motivates this thesis. In this documentation, a journey is made from the beginning of project management to 2020, highlighting important milestones, methodologies and characters throughout history. To clarify the existing indicators in Chile, a survey is carried out among people who work in project management, they are asked about the pros and cons of the methodologies used by the respondents, as well as a methodological proposal is developed to contribute towards the improvement in the projects. The survey results indicate that each methodology influences positively in meeting deadlines, flexibility to change, project costs and company culture, regardless of whether it is Traditional, Lean or Agile. The survey shows that the strength of Traditional is related to project costs and its weakness to flexibility to change. Agile, on the other hand, has strength in flexibility to change, meeting deadlines and business culture. Finally, it is concluded that Lean, Traditional or Agile methodologies have different profiles and depending on the projects needs and team we can select one or another approach. Agile methodologies are not intrinsically above others.
The extensive offer of project management methodologies and the different approaches, together with the author's perception that Agile methodologies are above Traditional ones, motivates this thesis. In this documentation, a journey is made from the beginning of project management to 2020, highlighting important milestones, methodologies and characters throughout history. To clarify the existing indicators in Chile, a survey is carried out among people who work in project management, they are asked about the pros and cons of the methodologies used by the respondents, as well as a methodological proposal is developed to contribute towards the improvement in the projects. The survey results indicate that each methodology influences positively in meeting deadlines, flexibility to change, project costs and company culture, regardless of whether it is Traditional, Lean or Agile. The survey shows that the strength of Traditional is related to project costs and its weakness to flexibility to change. Agile, on the other hand, has strength in flexibility to change, meeting deadlines and business culture. Finally, it is concluded that Lean, Traditional or Agile methodologies have different profiles and depending on the projects needs and team we can select one or another approach. Agile methodologies are not intrinsically above others.
Description
Keywords
METODOLOGÍA ÁGIL , INDICADORES DE CALIDAD , GESTIÓN DE PROYECTOS