Thesis MODELOS DE NEGOCIACIÓN: ANÁLISIS DEL PROCESO DE NEGOCIACIÓN COLECTIVA EN MINERA LA ESCONDIDA
Date
2017
Authors
ALTAMIRANO GONZÁLEZ, FELIPE EDUARDO
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
El objetivo de este documento se centra en realizar un análisis de la negociación colectiva en la que se encontraba el Sindicato n°1 de operarios y Minera Escondida, a la luz de un modelo de negociación y cuáles serían los beneficios o perjuicios de que dicha negociación se llevara a cabo siguiendo un modelo de negociación propuesto. Con este objetivo, se presenta una descripción general de los modelos de negociación tradicionales, para posteriormente seleccionar uno de ellos y realizar un minucioso análisis comparativo de las distintas etapas del conflicto, según como se han llevado a cabo y cómo se deberían realizar de acuerdo al modelo.Otro de los elementos sujetos a análisis corresponde a los efectos generados por la huelga del Sindicato N°1 de MEL (Minera Escondida Limitada). Mientras que los costos directos son evidentes, como por ejemplo, pérdida de productividad, sustitución de trabajadores, paralización de plantas, etc., los costos indirectos tales como el deterioro de la relación entre empleador y trabajadores a menudo son soslayados, a pesar de que puede llegar a tener un impacto mucho mayor en el largo plazo afectando la producción y el buen ambiente laboral.La negociación está presente en nuestra vida desde nuestra más temprana edad, y a medida que crecemos vamos desarrollando nuestra propia forma de negociar. Podemos preguntarnos “¿por qué debemos negociar?” y naturalmente surge la respuesta, “porque no siempre podemos imponer nuestra voluntad”. Sin embargo, lo que parece tan lógico no siempre se da de forma óptima en materias de relaciones trabajador-empresa.Con datos obtenidos de la prensa, la Comisión Chilena del Cobre (COCHILCO), el Consejo Minero, de las partes en conflicto (petitorios - proyectos de contrato colectivo) y de la literatura consultada se ha logrado diseccionar la negociación de MEL y proponer un modelo coorperativo de solución de conflictos como una alternativa exitosa tanto para la empresa como para sus trabajadores.
The aim of this document is to analyze the collective negotiation between Minera Escondida and the Union No.1 of operators, in relation to a proposed negotiation model and the benefits or prejudices of carrying it out following such negotiation model. Considering this, a general description of the traditional negotiation models is presented, to later select one of them and make a detailed comparative analysis of the different stages of the conflict, according to how they have been carried out and how they should be carried out according to the model.Another element subject to analysis corresponds to the effects generated by the strike of the MEL Trade Union No. 1 (Minera Escondida Limitada). While direct costs are evident, such as loss of productivity, substitution of workers, plant shutdown, etc., indirect costs such as the deterioration of the employer-worker relationship are often overlooked, even though it can have a much greater impact in the long term, affecting production and good working environment.Negotiation is present in our lives from our earliest age, and as we grow we are developing our own way of negotiating. We can ask ourselves "why should we negotiate?" And the answer naturally arises, "because we cannot always impose our will." However, what seems so logical is not always optimal in matters of worker-company relations.With data obtained from the press, the Chilean Copper Commission (COCHILCO - Comisión Chilena del Cobre), the Mining Council, the parties to the conflict (Petitions - collective agreement drafts) and the literature consulted it has been possible to dissect the MEL negotiation and propose a coorperative model for conflict solving as a successful alternative for both the company and its workers.
The aim of this document is to analyze the collective negotiation between Minera Escondida and the Union No.1 of operators, in relation to a proposed negotiation model and the benefits or prejudices of carrying it out following such negotiation model. Considering this, a general description of the traditional negotiation models is presented, to later select one of them and make a detailed comparative analysis of the different stages of the conflict, according to how they have been carried out and how they should be carried out according to the model.Another element subject to analysis corresponds to the effects generated by the strike of the MEL Trade Union No. 1 (Minera Escondida Limitada). While direct costs are evident, such as loss of productivity, substitution of workers, plant shutdown, etc., indirect costs such as the deterioration of the employer-worker relationship are often overlooked, even though it can have a much greater impact in the long term, affecting production and good working environment.Negotiation is present in our lives from our earliest age, and as we grow we are developing our own way of negotiating. We can ask ourselves "why should we negotiate?" And the answer naturally arises, "because we cannot always impose our will." However, what seems so logical is not always optimal in matters of worker-company relations.With data obtained from the press, the Chilean Copper Commission (COCHILCO - Comisión Chilena del Cobre), the Mining Council, the parties to the conflict (Petitions - collective agreement drafts) and the literature consulted it has been possible to dissect the MEL negotiation and propose a coorperative model for conflict solving as a successful alternative for both the company and its workers.
Description
Catalogado desde la version PDF de la tesis.
Keywords
MINERA LA ESCONDIDA , MODELO COOPERATIVO DE NEGOCIACION , NEGOCIACION COLECTIVA